AI-assisted research

Discovery R&D,
built AI-native.

Electrome connects scientific evidence, AI-assisted research, signal modeling, protocol design, controlled experiments, statistical validation, and documentation in one human-led learning loop.

Research workflow
01EvidenceGround the question
02ComputeRank and model
03ExperimentTest in the lab
04ValidateReplicate and review
05DocumentPublish or stop
One platform, two realities

A commercial foundation. A research engine.

Pain is Electrome's first commercial focus. FDA-cleared devices establish a real operating foundation while Discovery R&D investigates what bioelectric medicine could become.

Available today

FDA-cleared PSWT device

ActiPatch® is a commercial device for its labeled pain use. This is the current product foundation.

Current products
Research platform

MATRIX Discovery

Operating internal AI-native R&D software for evidence, candidate ranking, modeling, controlled laboratory experiments, replication, publication, and documentation, all under a human scientific release gate.

Explore the science
Discovery R&D pipeline

From a research question to evidence that can stand up to review.

  • Commercial todayFDA-cleared PSWT devices for labeled pain uses
  • Operating internallyLaboratory research software and workflows, not patient care
  • Research directionProposed concept, not built, cleared, or available
MATRIX Discovery research loop, schematicFour illustrated phases left to right: evidence documents, a computational model graph, a controlled laboratory sample over a coil, and a measurement trace. A scientist review checkpoint sits between each phase, and an arrow returns reviewed results to evidence and modeling. Schematic only; laboratory research, not patient care.Reviewed results, including negative ones, return to the question and the modelsEvidenceSteps 01-03ComputationSteps 04-05Controlled labSteps 06-07MeasurementStep 08Scientist reviewScientist reviewScientist review
  1. 1Evidence · source-grounded literature review (Steps 01-03)
  2. 2Computation · hypotheses and mathematical models (Steps 04-05)
  3. 3Controlled lab · protocol and wet-lab signal delivery (Steps 06-07)
  4. 4Measurement · instrument observations, statistics, replication (Step 08)
  5. Scientist review sits between every phase; reviewed results return to the question and the models.
Phase 1 · Question and evidence
AI-native, scientist-directed
  1. 01Define the research question

    Scientists set a bounded biological question, success criteria, and interpretation limits.

    Operating internally
  2. 02Discover the literature

    Specialized research agents search and organize public scientific evidence for review.

    Operating internally
  3. 03Extract and rank evidence

    Evidence is grounded to sources, compared for quality, and ranked without replacing scientific judgment.

    Operating internally
Human review: Scientists review grounded evidence before hypotheses
Phase 2 · Hypotheses and models
AI-native, scientist-directed
  1. 04Generate and challenge hypotheses

    Agents work adaptively in parallel and sequence to propose, compare, and challenge candidate explanations.

    Operating internally
  2. 05Model candidate signals

    Mathematical and statistical models help scientists explore candidate signal-response relationships.

    Operating internally
Human review: Scientists select candidates before any protocol
Phase 3 · Controlled laboratory work
Researcher-run
  1. 06Design a controlled protocol

    Scientists translate selected candidates into reproducible laboratory protocols and review gates.

    Operating internally
  2. 07Run hardware-controlled experiments

    Defined signals are delivered in controlled wet-lab studies; instruments record experimental observations.

    Operating internally
  3. 08Validate and replicate

    Researchers apply statistical checks, replication, negative controls, and human interpretation.

    Operating internally
Human review: Scientists approve protocols and interpret every experiment
Human scientific release gate
After review
  1. 09Publish and document

    Results that clear scientific review can advance to peer review, publication, and regulatory documentation.

    Operating internally
  2. 10Expand the learning loop

    The roadmap links validated evidence back into improved models and future programmable delivery research.

    In development

Work that does not clear review stops or returns to an earlier phase. Nothing here reaches a patient.

Learning loop: reviewed results, including negative ones, return to step 01 to sharpen the next research question and to step 05 to refine candidate models. Each return passes human review again.

Specialized AI tools support the research workflow.

MATRIX Discovery supports research under human scientific oversight and is not an autonomous scientist. It does not diagnose, monitor, or treat a person.

Evidence grounding

AI-assisted tools help search, extract, compare, and rank scientific evidence while preserving links to source material.

Research workflow support

Specialized AI tools can support parallel and sequential research tasks as scientists direct the workflow.

Modeling and simulation

Mathematical and statistical models help scientists compare candidate signal-response relationships before experiments.

Human scientific review

Scientists define the question, inspect assumptions, operate experiments, interpret findings, and decide what advances.

Maturity map

Clear about what exists and what does not yet.

Maturity of each Electrome capability
CapabilityCommercial todayOperating internallyIn developmentResearch direction
FDA-cleared PSWT devices for labeled pain usesCommercial today
MATRIX Discovery internal R&D softwareOperating internally
AI-assisted evidence, candidate ranking, and protocol workOperating internally
Controlled wet-lab experimentation and statistical reviewOperating internally
Expanded research programsIn development
Stronger model-to-experiment feedbackIn development
Additional validation and documentation workflowsIn development
MATRIX System mat research and bench prototypingIn development
Proposed Scan → Diagnose → Compute loopResearch direction
Human-authorized Treat → Measure → AdaptResearch direction
Treat again only after reviewResearch direction

Validation and an appropriate regulatory pathway are required before any future MATRIX System use. A row's position is a current status, not a timeline.

First end-to-end proof point

A pipeline-selected candidate reached peer review.

A platform-selected candidate produced a measurable, replicated in-vitro result on the first day of experiments; peer-reviewed publication followed approximately six months after the initial laboratory work.

This preclinical in-vitro result does not establish a Lyme disease treatment, cure, clinical efficacy, or use in people. No Electrome product is cleared or marketed for Lyme disease or any infectious condition.

Frontiers in Medicine · August 11, 2026Preclinical · In vitro · Research only

Arresting spirochetes: nonthermal extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure suppresses Borrelia burgdorferi motility in vitro

Erik A. Nilsen, Heather Adkison, John R. Martinez, Nevena Zubcevik, and Monica E. Embers

Division of Immunology at the Tulane National Biomedical Research Center, Tulane University

First official pathway · Company program milestone
  1. 01
    AI-native evidence analysis and hypotheses

    Specialized AI tools supported literature review and hypothesis work.

  2. 02
    Modeling and candidate ranking

    Models helped rank a candidate for scientists to consider.

  3. 03
    Human scientific review

    Scientists decided what advanced to the laboratory.

  4. 04
    Controlled laboratory research

    In-vitro experiments with replication, run by researchers.

  5. 05
    Peer-reviewed publication

    Frontiers in Medicine, August 2026.

Current stagePreclinical · In vitro · Research onlyNo clinical or human studies are shown here.

Lyme research is the first official pathway Electrome reports as having progressed through MATRIX Discovery to peer review. This is a company program milestone, not independent validation that AI tools caused the result. A platform-selected candidate produced a measurable, replicated in-vitro result on the first day of experiments; peer-reviewed publication followed approximately six months after the initial laboratory work.

This preclinical in-vitro result does not establish a Lyme disease treatment, cure, clinical efficacy, or use in people. No Electrome product is cleared or marketed for Lyme disease or any infectious condition.

Arresting spirochetes: nonthermal extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure suppresses Borrelia burgdorferi motility in vitro

MATRIX Discovery and GrowthOS serve different purposes.

MATRIX Discovery is internal R&D software supporting therapeutic research. GrowthOS is Electrome's separate internal, human-governed commercialization and operating infrastructure. It coordinates company work; it is not a patient-care or scientific decision-making system.

Follow the vision from foundation to validation.

Appearance